Saturday, 21 May 2016

proposed Draft Call for Papers and abstract template - based on 2014 draft - Kono Conference 2016

1st Kono Global Conference London – 28-29 July 2016                             University of London School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Vernon Square, London, WC1X, UK

Paving the Way For Better Prospects: Understanding the past, marking the challenges and setting our future

Hosted by the Kono District Development Association UK in association with the KDGO & all national and international Kono Organisations
CALL FOR PAPERS
The 1st Kono Global Conference will be the first of its kind concerning the Kono Peoples and District of Sierra Leone, West Africa. l Highlighting the debates on Kono’s current condition and its l future sustainable development, as well as minority, indigenous and human rights issues rarely if ever openly discussed.
The conference l introduces Kono and Kono’s little known unique identity and historic significance to the world stage. It provides a balanced mix of speakers from individuals to non-governmental organisations, stimulating challenging debates on the state and future of Kono and its people.
It moves the discourse on from problems, to finding resources, lessons learned and solutions within the international global community.

OUTPUTS:

1 Past and current: Raise the profile of Kono District and Kono indigenous ethnic group and the issues facing them. Benchmark each sector of sustainable development (health, environment, social, economic) and human rights
2. Problems and challenges: Engage and involve stakeholders to identify problems, their root causes and challenges
3. Future: Enable stakeholders to identify solutions to root causes and formulate a stakeholders’ action plan.
4. Agreed motions, resolutions, position papers, benchmarks

TARGET AUDIENCES:

Kono’s and descendants of the Kono District globally
Governmental and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO’s and CBO’s)) and activists (sustainable development, agriculture, human rights, indigenous rights, environmental degradation, mining impacts, female and child rights, social political and economic security, legal action on behalf of communities)
Academics
UK, European and Sierra Leone civil society, local government, politicians and traditional authorities

THEME:

Paving the way for better prospects: Understanding the past, marking the challenges and setting our future

SUGGESTIONS FOR PAPERS:

You’re invited to submit your paper and presentation addressing issues relating to, but not limited to the subjects below. Please send us a brief abstract before you send your full presentation.
Introduction to the Kono District, its peoples, history, issues, challenges, threats, opportunities
Role of the Diaspora
Non-sustainable development in Kono – past/ present.
Mining and land, community revenue and rights
 environmental impact, degradation,  deforestation restoration of soils, lands conservation
The Resource Curse – stories from our neighbours.
The future of sustainable development in Kono
UN Article 8 Declaration On the Rights Of Indigenous Peoples, identity, self-definition, the right to exist, minorities, Diversity vs homogeny.
Human rights, international advocacy and litigation on behalf of communities
Improving institutions
Economic development- diversification of livelihoods, (eg. Agriculture, agroforestry)
Local Government - action plan implementation
Building our networks and partnerships
Motions and resolutions to ratify and support existing international instruments, treaties, policies & networks
International and Global Mobilising and action planning

Diaspora investment and settlement in Kono – the butterfly effect, the snowball effect.
Human resources in Kono – raising; standards, skills, quality, supervision, dependability, organisational capacity, motivation to excel, strategic thinking.

CALL FOR EXHIBITORS AND SPONSORS:

An exhibition will run alongside the conference offering organisations an outstanding opportunity to promote their campaigns and products to the influential speakers and delegates. Space is limited so book early to get prime space and avoid missing out. Suppliers can also gain additional exposure through the variety of promotional opportunities for sponsors. See web site for exhibition details, floor layout and sponsorship opportunities.

BACKGROUND:
For a decade in the 1990’s the Kono District was decimated and its people displaced during the Sierra Leone war and the mad scramble for Kono’s ‘blood diamonds’. Many Internally Displaced People and refugees have returned but Kono is still one of the most underdeveloped and neglected regions of Sierra Leone, suffering the environmental and social impacts of kimberlite and alluvial diamond mining. The Kono, district, people, land and culture are all under threat, the Kono language is yet to be recognised in the national curriculum. Kono’s trunk road is one of the last to be built. Because of this the people of Kono are becoming motivated to raise their self-awareness, become a cohesive force for sustainable development and find their way forward.

Template for abstract:
As a guide you can use the following format:
Proposals for papers should be in English and comprise a cover page plus an abstract of the paper.  
(Presentation time will most likely be around 25 minutes of which  10 minutes will be allocated to introduction and questions).
The abstract should contain:
Title of the paper 
Full name and title (Mr., Ms., Dr., Prof.) 
Name of your organisation if applicable
Job Title 
A brief CV of 100 words 
A brief description of the main points of the proposed presentation in 200 – 300 words plus three key messages or learning points stated at the end
The proposed abstract should be submitted using Word

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

KDDAUK, KONO & CONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES

(Apologies for previous errors: The legislation concerning mineral resource ownership is contained in the Mines and Minerals Act 2009 not the constitution)

KDDAUK is a Diaspora-led UK charity that has among other things carried out HR advocacy on behalf of the Kono indigenous ethnic group and the Kono District of Sierra Leone. It has recently been exploring the potential for legal actions and taking advantage of the protection of international instruments, especially those concerning indigenous peoples, minorities and land and resource rights.

The Kono ethnic group suffer victimisation, discrimination and political/police suppression. The Kono District suffers environmental degradation and severe underdevelopment. Both phenomena are partly due to the 'resource curse'. Kono's and Kono have the unenviable distinction of being the people referred to in the Hollywood movie 'Blood Diamond' and were driven from their lands because of the 11 year armed scramble for the resources under their feet by a variety of actors, this ended officially in 2002. They have been written out of ownership of their land's mineral resources by Section 2(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act 2009 and now suffer from kimberlite blasting as close as 500 metres  from residences (see ‘Koidu’ Google Earth) , pollution, displacement and receive very little returns in exchange for the tens of thousands of carats per month that are extracted from the district.

In the last few years, the young Mayor of Koidu has advocated strongly in favour of Kono’s and local community rights. He recently initiated legal proceedings for unpaid community development taxes on behalf of the local community, against OCTEA Ltd owned by Beny Steinmetz' BSRG group, which has been named in the Panama Papers.  As the legal system in Sierra Leone is known to work at the behest of the executive arm of government, there was no chance the courts would find in favour of the Mayor. Before the case was concluded he was suspended by decree on trumped up allegations initiated by government ministers. Despite being completely exonerated by the Anti Corruption Commission he is yet to be reinstated. In his absence the court held that OCTEA was not a registered company in Sierra Leone therefore was not active in the country and could not be sued for unpaid taxes.  The decision caused widespread outrage among Sierra Leoneans of all ethnicities at the impunity of international companies, complicity of central government and the continuing corruption of the legal system (following on from the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the sacking of the Vice President, a Kono). Among Kono’s this was perceived as yet another in a series of acts designed to suppress the Kono ethnic minority. There have since been demonstrations by Diaspora Kono’s in London at Tiffany’s at Selfridges and Sloane Square, and in two cities in the US, against the decision, OCTEA, BSRG and Tiffany & Co; reputed to be their largest customer.

KDDAUK intends to assist the mayor and other activists and radio journalists who have been silenced or driven underground for advocating on behalf of the District and the Kono people.

Regardless of current tax liabilities there are nationwide concerns at the low level of national and local revenue written into mining concessions and agreed by central government, the failure of government to gain the full participation of local communities in setting their own terms and their failure to ensure full informed consent of communities without duress once those terms have been agreed. Documentary and recorded evidence exists of Kono communities being  publicly threatened by members of government at the highest levels with withdrawal of all community development action or funds if they did not comply with the government or objected to their actions.  Consultation with paramount chiefs, who are the legal trustees of land, cannot be deemed as community consent, as there is a rift between local communities and their paramount chiefs; the latter are perceived to be working on behalf of the government and not on behalf of their people or for the protection of land and environment. The paramount chiefs have not made it clear whether they act (or stay silent)  willingly or under duress. In any event  KDDAUK are interested in exploring international rights and conventions  that would empower communities to re-open and renegotiate resource contracts, setting their own terms. And international jus cogens that would impose a moral duty on companies and governments to do same.

There is currently a constitutional review in process in Sierra Leone. However, the Sierra Leonean parliament is as beholden to the executive arm of government as is the civil service and judiciary. This is likely to affect chances of repeal of S2(1) of the  Mines and minerals Act which removes  ownership of mineral resources from local communities and grants it to central government (‘the Republic’). Nevertheless the review commission has shown its willingness to make recommendations that do not suit the executive and there may still be a chance of making strong representations for this section to be repealed and for the constitution to guarantee the rights of local communities to decide and receive the revenue and royalties from, and control, mineral resources, and guarantee their exclusive use for the strong sustainable development of local communities, with a minority of revenue going  to central government.


Saturday, 7 May 2016

Yengema Secondary School (YSS) Stakeholders Workshop


Yengema Secondary School Old Students Teachers and Friends Association (YSSOSTFA)
Workshop held at Yengema Secondary School, Kono, Sierra Leone on Tuesday 12 April 2016
 

Workshop Overview


1 Purpose
  1. To engage a variety of the school’s stakeholders in discussions concerning the school and mobilise stakeholder interest and participation in the welfare and outcomes of the school and its students (stakeholders to include students, teachers, governors, parents, members of the local community, local authorities, the parish, other contributors to the school, local and Freetown alumni associations).
  2. To identify and discuss problems preventing attainment and other issues at the school, and root causes and their effects.
  3. To brainstorm and identify solutions, key objectives and plans of action to be taken by various stakeholders
2 Methodology
A workshop was publicised by email to the school’s authorities and to YOSA Freetown several weeks prior to the visit, as part of a series of activities over several days including an arranged inspection of the school by YOSA-Freetown and YSSOSTFA, discussions with authorities, and inspection of projects and use of assets by YSSOSTFA.  The school was consulted about their willingness to participate in the activity, YOSA Freetown assisted in mobilising the school and added their weight and influence to the request. The activity was planned for after school to give time to inspectors to add encouragement to stakeholders to participate.  The school was requested to inform all stakeholders and invite them. They informed us that they had put out announcements to some groups of stakeholders (including the governors who had been there in the morning but left early) but that not all stakeholder groups had been informed.

The original intention was for at least 20 to 30 participants representative of all stakeholder groups, including junior and senior students. In the event there were about 35 attendees, mostly teachers, approximately 10 to 15 students who were mostly seniors, with two or three parents, some of whom were local YOSA members. An attendees’ register was taken by the librarian. The workshop lasted approximately 2 hours.

Stakeholders were asked to identify (and discuss if they wished) what they felt was the main central problem with YSS, and write this on a post- it note. These were collected by one of the participants and allowed all participants to express their views anonymously without fear of sanctions. After all post-it notes were collected, they were read out and posted on a flipchart page. A pattern soon emerged and the facilitator with the participants, identified 4 problem categories.

Due to lack of time it was not possible to deal with each problem category. The participants were asked to choose the one thing amongst the 4 categories identified which they felt was the central problem at the school. The overwhelming majority agreed on one, "Administration and Leadership".

The participants were then asked to participate in an activity to identify the root causes of the central problem and its effects using the "problem tree" methodology. 

The most vocal respondents were teachers and other adult stakeholders. The students remained silent during the first part of the discussions, which covered a lot of controversial areas and were heated. During these discussions it was possible for the participants to identify and discuss numerous root causes and categorise them into headings and at the same time identify and agree some of the undesirable effects of the root problems. The facilitator then invited the students to participate and give their views. Surprisingly some of the students came forward with very frank views despite being in a room full of teachers. There was some uncomfortable murmuring from a couple of teachers, however the facilitator asked that the students be allowed to give their honest opinions, stating that if the problems at the school were to be addressed and solved, it would require openness and honesty. The teachers consented and the students continued. There was some evidence that some students were speaking up as supporters of the current teachers’ power structure and putting forward what appeared to be pro-teacher pro-school propaganda, however they were contradicted by other students who gave frank views without apparently being worried about recrimination.

3 Results
Participants initially identified the central problem as follows and subsequently agreed on 4 main problem categories;

Responses:
1. Administration and leadership (13 responses)
·         Poor administration, poor teacher relationships
·         Poor leadership
·         Unequal treatment given to teachers by the administration, overloading of teachers by giving him or her more than one subject
·         The administration of the school,
·         Poor leadership, 11 years rebel war
·         Administration of the school
·         Leadership of the school to be replaced
·         The acting principal of the school who feels he can do everything in the school all alone
·         Administrative problems (the school is bigger than the principal as he does all)
·         Poor leadership
·         No delegation of responsibilities by principal
·         Leadership
  • Catholic mission
2. Resources (9 responses)
·         Inadequate learning materials like books
·         Sitting accommodation
·         Less amount of teachers for all the subject areas
·         We the students of the school lack of science test practicals with equipment from the laboratory
·         Scholarship facilities
·         Lack of textbooks
·         Good library (ie we do not have enough books)
·         Learning materials
  • Teaching materials
Discipline and attitude (4 responses)
·         Indiscipline
·         The attitudes of pupils
·         Lack of interest in education on the part of the pupils
·         Pupil teacher relationship not always cordial and directional
National (4 responses)
·         Educational system of the country
·         Poor wages of unapproved teachers
·         New teachers are not on payroll for some time when they get employed, accommodation for serving teachers
·         Poor wages of unapproved teachers



At the beginning, participants were very keen to point at the acting principal as the sole root cause of the problem of leadership and administration, however as their discussions progressed participants found the problem had a variety of root causes, including themselves.

The participants’ identification of ROOT CAUSES were as follows:




At the beginning, participants were very eager to point to the acting principal as the sole root cause of the problem of leadership and administration, however as their discussions progressed participants found the problem had a variety of root causes, including themselves.

As root causes were identified, participants identified some of their EFFECTS as follows:



As long-standing grievances were aired and the negative results of the pervasive negative culture in the school became clear, most participants expressed some dismay or regret at the undesirable situation and vicious cycle they had helped create or perpetuate.  It was not clear at the conclusion whether the exercise had had enough of a shock effect to encourage the will for sustainable change. There were evidently positive minds present who want to see things improve but they expressed worry about being ridiculed and PHD’ and expressed that their willingness to continue at the school may be limited if things didn't improve. Attainment and exam results were not mentioned by participants although they were implicit in the conversation

The facilitator informed participants that, rather than continuing on to the next step in the exercise (i.e. the solution tree; identifying an objective, solutions to counteract the root causes and identifying desired outcomes), this seemed a good place to stop and reflect on the damage caused to the school and its students by this culture. The facilitator left them to consider whether indeed they wanted to improve things or keep them as they are. The participants were left with the option of completing the converse of the problem tree; i.e. the solution tree, at a future date if they were serious about reversing the trends in the school. Participants expressed earnest intention to do so, however post workshop conversations suggested there was much scepticism that this or sustained change would happen. This could be because of negativity.
There have been reports in April and May of some improvement in culture at the school. The governors have recently taken a bold action to split the school and have each headed by a separate principal, one for the senior secondary school (SSS) and one for the junior secondary school (JSS). There are early indications of a will by governors and the heads to improve discipline at the school, although there are also worries by some that victimisation and power play by teachers may be still be occurring. 

4 Conclusions and recommendations

Objective 1 and 2 were accomplished, objective 3 was not.

It is highly recommended that the positivity engendered by the YOSA and YSSOSTFA visits, observations, discussions and workshop,  should be capitalised on quickly, and a clear message sent to disruptive elements that there is a mood of change and external support for such change. A shake up of governors and recruitment and empowerment of local YOSA is urgent, as are incentives for those positive minded teachers who are actually a positive counter-influence at the school. 

YSS Science Club presentation 12 April

Sunday, 1 May 2016

Another Image of Sierra Leone - a Failure to Look

When a person enters a country, their first impressions count. These can be changed by something contrasting, or reinforced by more of the same. So it is with Sierra Leone.

Outside the country the images we see in the general and social media are made up of countless photographs; of politicians and their followers celebrating one thing or another, individuals posing for the camera, people in anti-ebola clothing, ambulances and quarantine centres, war victims, idyllic beaches, beautiful landscapes, shiny happy faces, or horrifically graphic accident victims. There may even be some nostalgic images of wildlife thrown in here or there. But does this photo album give an accurate image of Sierra Leone? As anyone walks through the airport, into the country and outside of Freetown, is this what they see? What we see is what the cameras point at.

As we wander about in our daily lives we usually notice the things that are out of the ordinary, the things we're not used to. In the case of those coming from other countries, the scenes we see in Sierra Leone are very different, and so they'll stand out.  As a child of nine stepping off the plane, I can never forget the warm humid blanket that enveloped me. Stepping off this April I noticed the absence of another childhood memory, the smell of smoked fish mixed with charcoal and permeating the air everywhere. Where had it gone? At 4am in a rickety vehicle travelling from the airport to the ferry along the night road, I noticed the vehicle, the darkness, the heat, the insects, the many huddled shadows of children and women with large bundles sitting by the roadside. Waiting for the ferry I noticed the quiet small queue of vehicles and people milling around outside the gate, sitting around on benches and in their vehicles, and the constant warmth.

On the ferry my senses were overwhelmed by sights and sounds too many to describe. The lasting image was of the dilapidated state of the ferry, overloading, endless delay, the mass of market people treated literally like cattle and risking their limbs and their produce to find a niche on the boat, smells of all kinds, the heat inside and outside of the vehicle and the dirtiness of every surface. Then came the assaulting images of Freetown. Insanity on the roads, a cacophony of sounds, dirt and dust on everything, the bravest pedestrians in the world, every kind of bric-a-brac selling from so many small open shops and laid out on the roadside.  More mad okada motorbikers than you can imagine, with their insanity spreading to their passengers who put their lives in the hands of these outlaws. The yellow taxi drivers; no better, just driving more dangerous vehicles.

Some may say these images are the ingredients that give the city some semblance of charm, although this romantic view is knocked back every few metres by a pungent wave of urine or raw sewage. All those photographs I mentioned before cannot capture the toxic exhaust fumes from countless generators and engines stuck in traffic, they cannot capture the even more toxic fumes of hydrogen cyanide, hydrochloric acid, dioxins and furans released each day across the country from tonnes of burning plastic, or the chronic coughing induced after a few days by breathing in this lethal cocktail. Nor do the images we see portray the decline of morality, compassion and social responsibility, or capture the insecurity of a lawless state, inaccessible healthcare or little social security.

Perhaps it is time to question whether any of this is actually invisible and ask whether the images are there to be seen but are not noticed, do the images portray this decline and insecurity?

Somehow people are able to travel daily past the un-emptied stench of the gutters outside their own houses without noticing them, step past the blue drinking water supply pipes submerged in these stinking gutters without batting an eye. They can drive or walk up unpaved, unmaintained back streets without noticing the bumps or damage to their fine vehicles or sandals, past periodic rubbish dumps filling riverbeds without seeing their danger or wondering where the rubbish ends up, and without smelling the even more lethal cocktail of toxins released by burning plastic. Perhaps that's the reason right there, poster blindness, the denial of danger or personal responsibility, exhibited perfectly by the government and people for months after the first outbreak of ebola and exhibited just as well today by apparently sane respectable okada passengers.  The failure to look, practised at least twice a day by 17 presidential vehicles, countless ministers and civil servants, Visit-Sierra-Leone-dot-com and millions of inhabitants.

I think there are images that portray the decline of morality, compassion, social responsibility and the insecurity of a lawless state. Look up at every hillside and hilltop around the country that has been shaved as bare as a bad haircut and savaged and scarred by a holocaust of flame. Now imagine how they looked covered in lush forest. Do not fail to take a long hard look at the image of your waterless tap and ask what forest feeds the watersheds. Look into every river under the bridges of Freetown, and ask yourself where all this plastic is going to end up? (Perhaps this is a question to ask before you buy the next plastic drink). Visit Lumley's beautiful beach and take a dip in the luxuriously warm waters rich with detritus, plastic and unknown solutions. Look in and smell the gutters outside your front door.  And do not fail to look at what is being done to our land, all over the country.

You can see these images on You Tube: https://youtu.be/F-y3sGyPmYY or on Flickr: https://flic.kr/s/aHskAuGUpi




Sahr O Fasuluku, 1 May 2016





The Price of Development - Photos from Sierra Leone April, 2016